For example, if Odd Warrior becomes the meta for the next expansion, we should list that as such. I would list decks under expansions even if those decks appeared in other expansion time periods. contribs) 06:20, 6 March 2019‎ But that wouldn't be indicative of the actual meta during that time period.I think we should only list decks under the expansion they originally came to existence/ underwent major change in, e.g., only list odd warrior in the witchwood - Preceding unsigned comment added by Cactusisawesome ( talk Past Hearthstone tournament videos from the Hearthstone Championship Tour might be a good source of information. Writing about an all-inclusive history of Hearthstone's meta would be hard without the help of some external sources though to actually remember what the meta had been like. A short write-up for the wild meta can be included with every recent expansion (such as saying things about 'Barnes Priest', 'Odd Paladin', 'Secret Aggro Mage', 'Renolock', 'Mill Rogue', 'Quest Rogue', and such). For the wild meta, I guess that would be tricky as well, but the wild meta was literally the standard meta before wild was created, so there's fewer things to write about, and also the wild meta shouldn't really change that much since it contains so many cards (notwithstanding card changes). Its hard to believe that 2015 is almost over and with that, a wonderful year of Hearthstone. Short write-ups for every expansion/adventure can also work. Blue Banana whotookthisname ( talk) 16:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC) For every balance patch, that could be tricky, but there usually is just one or two major balance patch for every expansion/adventure that changes the meta, so it can be doable. I'm thinking of maybe 5-10 most popular decks from each meta to give the reader a quick overview, and maybe some short write-out of characteristics and details of each meta. Not in the amount of detail the current meta is described, but yes, I think that'd be a good idea. Is it possible to document the meta in every balance patch instead of expansion? And what about wild metas?Ĭactusisawesome ( talk) 09:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC) Aegonostic ( talk) 17:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC) How much detail should history give?

That actually sounds really nice, I can probably help out somewhat. Beat the metaInterested in Hearthstone Standard Decks Check this out. Does anyone else agree on this? Would someone be willing to offer their help on this project? Blue Banana whotookthisname ( talk) 14:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC) I'd like a section here on the history of meta, or maybe an article of its own. Haha yes, I've fixed it ) - Taohinton ( talk) 19:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC) History of meta Every month, Hearthstone offers a free card back, and to get it, you need to win five games in ranked mode, which may seem tough if you’re new to the game or favor a different game mode and want to use this month’s cool card back while you play. Should create a link to class instead of to the non-existent choice? - Karol007 ( talk) 15:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Hearthstone meta decks june 2015